Unit 3, Lesson 3
In Progress

Solving Problems

Unit Progress
0% Complete

Solving Problems




SESSION 1 (80 min) ANTICIPATION

Part 1: Anticipation: Mystery Bag Evidence Table (20 min)

The teacher places a closed backpack, box, or bag in the middle of the room. Around it, there are visual clues: a sports bottle, a broken pencil, a bus ticket, a science drawing, a small towel, headphones, a snack wrapper, and a notebook. Students cannot touch the bag at first. They only observe.

The teacher asks:

Students give simple guesses first:

Then the teacher upgrades their answers:

This introduces both grammar targets through a problem-solving context.

Part 2: Vocabulary Activation: Clue Touch Table (15 min)


Part 3: Grammar Discovery: Evidence Scale + Clause Magnets (25 min)

Use must when the evidence is strong.

“The phone is ringing. It must be inside the backpack.”

Use might / may / could when something is possible, but not certain.

“The notebook might belong to Ana.”

Use can’t when something is impossible or very unlikely.

“That can’t be Pedro’s jacket. It is too small.”

Structure:

subject + must / might / may / could / can’t + base verb

Examples:

“It must be important.”
“She might know the answer.”
“He can’t be the owner.”
“The device could be broken.”

A non-defining relative clause adds extra information. The sentence still makes sense without it. It uses commas.

Examples:

“Kmaleon, who is helping the class, found a clue.”
“The science lab, which is on the second floor, was closed yesterday.”
“My tablet, which is very old, stopped working.”

Key difference:

Defining: necessary information, no commas.
Non-defining: extra information, commas.


Students work in groups. Each group receives a visual clue scene. They must build three types of sentences:

  1. One strong deduction with must
  2. One possibility with might / could
  3. One sentence with a relative clause

Example:

Part 1 – Human Evidence Scale (15 min)

The room becomes a physical evidence scale. One side is “must,” the middle is “might,” and the other side is “can’t.” The teacher reads clues. Students move to the side that matches their deduction and explain orally.


Part 2 – Relative Clause Chain Reaction (15 min)

Students stand in a circle. One student says a noun. The next student must define it with a relative clause.

Example:

The teacher then adds challenge cards:


Each student gives one oral sentence before leaving:

Students prepare a live mystery board using drawings, icons, objects, or projected images. They do not write a full script. They organize their board into:


Groups present their mystery board as a live investigation. They must move objects, point to clues, and explain their reasoning. The audience acts as assistant detectives and asks questions.

Example:


Students vote for:

Students explain their vote orally.

Examples:


NEE – Agregar el tipo de adaptaciones curriculares

Principio II: Pautas 6.1 – 6.3 – 6.4 
Principio III: Pautas 7.1 – 8.1 – 9.1
ALUMNO 1: Constante monitoreo. Dar tiempo adicional para el desarrollo de la actividad y se reduce el número de ejercicios o se modifican los ejercicios con un nivel de dificultad reducido, de acuerdo con sus necesidades académicas. 
ALUMNO 2: Constante monitoreo, Dar tiempo adicional para el desarrollo de la actividad y se reduce el número de ejercicios o se modifican los ejercicios con un nivel de dificultad reducido, de acuerdo con sus necesidades académicas.
ALUMNO 3: Constante monitoreo. Corroborar que el contenido entregado en clase haya sido comprendido por la estudiante mediante retroalimentación.