Unit 4, Lesson 4
In Progress

Speaking Fluency

Unit Progress
0% Complete

Speaking Fluency




Part 1: Video Strategy Autopsy (20 min)

The teacher plays a short segment from a YouTube video where a speaker describes or compares photos. Students do not take notes about the content first. Instead, they identify the strategy.

The teacher then shows a new pair of photos and asks students to try only the first step: one general overview sentence.

Part 2: Vocabulary Activation: Visual Evidence Lenses (15 min)


Part 3: Speaking Input: From Description to Interpretation (30 min)

The teacher explains that students should not only say what is visible. They should move from description to interpretation.

Example:

“I can see students sitting around a table.”

Level 2: Organization
This answers: Where is everything?

Example:

“In the foreground, there are notebooks and a laptop. In the background, another group is working.”

Example:

“The students are discussing an idea and preparing a presentation.”

Example:

“They might be preparing for a school project because they are using notes and a laptop.”

Example:

“The photo suggests collaboration because everyone seems involved in the task.”

Examples:

“What do you think?”
“Do you agree?”
“Which photo do you think is stronger?”
“I see your point, but I would add that…”

The teacher gives students a fluency framework:

  1. Overview
    “Both photos show…” / “This image seems to show…”
  2. Key details
    “In the foreground…” / “In the background…” / “One important detail is…”
  3. Speculation
    “They might be…” / “This could be…” / “It seems that…”
  4. Interpretation
    “This suggests…” / “The image highlights…” / “The message could be…”
  5. Interaction
    “What do you think?” / “Would you agree?” / “Which one would you choose?”

Instead of teaching grammar from a worksheet, students annotate a photo directly.

The teacher projects a photo and draws transparent labels over it:

Students then annotate a new photo in pairs, either digitally or on printed photos. They write only short labels, not full paragraphs. After labeling, they speak using the labels.

Part 1 – Compare Without Listing Drill (15 min)

Students receive two photos. They cannot describe photo A completely and then photo B completely. They must compare from the first sentence.

Weak response:

“In photo A, I can see students. In photo B, I can see students.”

“Both photos show students, but the first one shows academic teamwork while the second one shows a more informal activity.”

Students practice with prompts:

Part 2 – Partner Expansion Loop (15 min)

Student A gives a short description. Student B must expand it by adding one of these:

Example:

This builds collaborative fluency instead of isolated answers.


Each student gives one sentence that includes:

Example:

Part 1 – Preparation: Photo Briefing Keywords (15 min)

Students prepare for the speaking test. They may write only five keywords:

Example:

Students cannot write full sentences.


Required:

Required:

Part C: Collaborative decision
Pairs receive three photos for a school campaign. They discuss for two minutes and choose the most effective photo.

Required interaction:


Part 3 – Peer Feedback Briefing (15 min)

Students give feedback using academic but simple frames:


NEE – Agregar el tipo de adaptaciones curriculares

Principio II: Pautas 6.1 – 6.3 – 6.4 
Principio III: Pautas 7.1 – 8.1 – 9.1
ALUMNO 1: Constante monitoreo. Dar tiempo adicional para el desarrollo de la actividad y se reduce el número de ejercicios o se modifican los ejercicios con un nivel de dificultad reducido, de acuerdo con sus necesidades académicas. 
ALUMNO 2: Constante monitoreo, Dar tiempo adicional para el desarrollo de la actividad y se reduce el número de ejercicios o se modifican los ejercicios con un nivel de dificultad reducido, de acuerdo con sus necesidades académicas.
ALUMNO 3: Constante monitoreo. Corroborar que el contenido entregado en clase haya sido comprendido por la estudiante mediante retroalimentación.